
This month's book for the Classics Bookclub was Jane Eyre.
I have read several other reviews of Jane Eyre, describing the beginning of the book as tedious and depressing. For me it was not so. The first few chapters obviously described the horrible circumstances in which Jane found herself as a child, but I actually enjoyed the contrast of the deprived childhood with her good fortune at the end of the book. It reminded me a bit of The Secret Garden, and how Mary has such an unhappy childhood, but then blossoms under the right circumstances.I noticed similarities in the description of John, the bullying cousin, to the character of Dudley from the Harry Potter series. Both had indulgent mothers who let them get away with anything, including beating up on their cousins.
As far as Jane being a feminist, I think that she expressed opinions that were forward-thinking for her time, but are out-dated in this day and age.
As a stay-at-home mom, I empathised with her when she talked about the expectation of women being satisfied in their "vocation" as women. "Women are supposed to be very calm generally: but women feel just as men feel; they need exercise for their faculties, and a field for their efforts as much as their brothers do; they suffer from too rigid a constraint, too absolute a stagnation, precisely as men would suffer."
Jane was also unusual for her time in that she wanted to support herself even after marriage, stating "I shall continue to act as Adele's governess, by that I shall earn my board and lodging, and thirty pounds a year besides. I'll furnish my own wardrobe out of that money." She wanted to retain her independence, and not be indebted to her husband.
I must include in this discussion about Jane, my pure disdain for St. John. Charlotte Bronte did an excellent job of creating this villain in disguise, and it has been a long time since I have been so angry at a fictitious character. His enormous ego, thinking that he was the only one who knew God's will, and that if she didn't agree to marry him she would face damnation, was incredible. His pretense that he was doing it all for her sake and salvation was equally disgusting.
I did find it interesting comparing her two love interests. St. John was the handsome and godly man, a sort of ideal, who wanted to mold Jane into a person he could respect. Mr. Rochester, while scarred and ugly, loved Jane for who she truly was. Both men, in their selfish interests tried to manipulate Jane, St. John through religious fervor, and Mr. Rochester with dishonesty.


17 comments:
If I had to pick one favorite book, Jane Eyre would probably be it. I love it! I don't think any part of it is tedious and depressing. =)
I agree that St. John is disgusting. He's probably my least favorite character. I adore Mr. Rochester though, and I can't really explain why because it's not as if he has any real redeeming features and he does lie to Jane! So who knows why, LOL.
Have you ever read The Eyre Affair by Jasper Fforde? It's a great follow-up now that the details of Jane Eyre are fresh in your mind.
Yes--great summary of the two loves! You're right exactly.
And honestly, I'm not sure if it was so much depressing, as maybe boring and dark. I don't know.
----
Snapshot
5 Minutes for Books
I agree, great thoughts about the two men in Jane's life.
I agree with what you said in regards to St. John. Although, I did not see him as wayward as you did.
Great perspective. (BTW, I was being sarcastic in my post when I said St. John was amazing. I felt the same way you did about him.) I totally agree with your likening this book to The Secret Garden. You are right - it had the same feel.
Thanks for your thoughts. I really enjoyed reading them.
I didn't think of comparing St John and Edward... good insight there. I haven't actually finished it yet but I've been posting a kind of reader's diary as I go. :-)
Oh I loved your contrast of St. John and Rochester. It's amazing how appearances can be so deceiving.
You did a great job with this post and I enjoyed reading your views. :)
I agree that St. John's belief that only he knows God's will for everyone else is very off-putting. I really dislike him as a character.
I also agree that both St. John and Rochester attempt to manipulate Jane; what's great is that she refuses to be manipulated. At the end of the book, she is really in a position of power in her marriage!
Wow! I've got to step in and defend St. John. He's not by any stretch of the imagination a favorite character of mine, but I don't think of him as a villian. I think he sincerely loves her, maybe not in a romantic way, but it's real, and his immature reaction to her refusal is that of a jilted lover. It seems to me that when St. John first gets to know Jane, she does appear to want to be society's ideal of a godly woman, so his surprise at her refusal to marry him makes sense. In fact, Jane herself does want to obey God, and I think she's trying to figure out how. So we get her anguished prayer and Rochester's voice carried (by God, perhaps?) on the wind, and Jane has her answer.
I find it really hard to square the reading of St. John as a villian with the fact that Bronte closes with his death, which is depicted as a sort of joyful homecoming.
Sorry--I've just got to get this dissenting view in! Jane Eyre is one of my favorite books, and Jane herself is one of those characters I can totally relate to!
St. John really got me this time around too! I haven't read The Secret Garden in years!
Teresa, I wasn't thinking of St. John as a "bad guy" in that he was terrible or irredeemable, but rather that he filled the role of villain in the second half of the book. He is definitely a complex character, and calling him a villain was probably a little bit too harsh.
That being said, I still can't stand the guy, and I think that is due to Charlotte Bronte's skilled writing.
Meghan, me too!
I think I need to reread it though. It's been so long. I didn't remember Mr. Rochester being dishonest until I read your review.
Alyce, I totally see what you mean now. Thanks for clarifying. Yes, I do think in therms of the narrative, he does serve as an antagonist, or an impediment, to Jane's finding her true place in the world.
One of the things that I think makes this such a great book is that most of the characters are so real, and they generally aren't entirely good or bad. And, as in life, different people will have different opinions regarding their likability. :-)
I for one would much prefer to spend time with someone like Edward than someone like St. John, but I've known an awful lot of St. Johns in my life, and the experience hasn't been entirely bad once I, like Jane, was able to extablish my own independence from them.
Almost every man Jane Eyre meets - her cousin, her schoolmaster, Rochester, St. John - tries to crush her. St. John is the only one who comes close to succeeding. That's why he is the villain.
The ending of the book is Jane's revenge on St. John.
Great review. And I too agree about St. John. But I'm with Meghan, I always liked Mr. Rochester and sympathized with him -- lies and deceptions and all.
Besides The Eyre Affair by Jasper Fforde, try Jean Rhys's Wide Sargasso Sea, which tells the story from Bertha's point of view. I know some people hated the book, but I remember being in entranced by it. I read it in the 1980s, and I recall that I couldn't put it down. Maybe I'll reread it.
Here's my analysis.
Rochester v. Darcy
Alyce, I read this book for the first time last year and really enjoyed it. I, too, noticed the John/Dudley similarities. I wonder if it was intentional?
Congrats on wrapping up another Lit Flicks Challenge pick. Do you intend to see a movie version?
Post a Comment